SISTERS OF ST. JOSEPH BRENTWOOD, NY

CONNECTING WITH OTHERS ON A SPIRITUAL JOURNEY

HOME

DAILY PRAYER

SPIRITUALITY

ECOLOGY

JUSTICE & PEACE

VOCATIONS

ABOUT US

BULLETIN BOARD

MEMORIALS

NEWSMAKERS

SPIRITUAL OFFERINGS

   Labyrinth

Students at the Labyrinth

SUPPORT OUR MISSION

CSJ Sponsored Ministries

Online Courses

 
Using the Computer

Species Extinction
                            
Clara Santoro, CSJ

The earth community is an intricate web of life. Each species has a specific niche in which it can 
flourish and function. The life style of one species affects the survival of many others; the needs 
of one species keeps the others in balance.

At the present time, we find ourselves in a situation where the unlimited growth and irresponsible
 consuming of the earth’s resources by one species is threatening the survival of all the others. 
That species is homo sapiens, ourselves. The activities of 5.6 billion humans , with the potential 
of more to come, are presently causing the extinction of other species and the potential extinction 
of many others. We present a threat to life as we know it.

Species become extinct or endangered for several reasons, but the primary cause is the destruction
of their habitats by the human species. Our irresponsible need to consume and expand has forced 
other species to abandon their habitats-- consider the raccoons and opossums and even bears seen
in our urban communities. Since these species have been forced out of their preferred niches, they
are deprived of the means to reproduce and survive.

Other causes of species extinction resulting from human activities are the following:

  • Pollution
  • Drainage of wetlands
  • Conversion of shrub land to grazing lands
  • Cutting and clearing of forests
  • Urbanization
  • Coral-reef destruction
  • Road and dam construction
  • Worldwide commercial exploitation of animals for food and other products
  • Non-native species introduced to a new ecosystem in which native plants and animals have 
    no natural defenses against them.

Extinction does not require every member of a species to die within a short period of time. All that
is necessary is that the species decline to a level where the reproduction rate is no longer viable. 
According to information gathered from the National Resources Defense Council, the 
Environmental Defense Fund, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, The National Wildlife Federation 
and the Natural Resources Defense Council the following statistics are valid:

  • 137 species are estimated to go extinct each day.
  • 50,000 species are estimated to go extinct each year.
  • 78 species were on the original United States endangered species list.
  • 1,201 species were on the U.S. endangered species list as of October 1999.
  • 43 percent of the endangered and threatened animals in the U.S. depend on wetlands.
  • 40 percent of all modern medicines are either modeled on or synthesized from natural 
    components derived from various species.
  • 95 percent of known plant species have yet to be screened for their medicinal value.
  • 30 million species of plants and animals—more than half of all life forms on our planet --
    live in rainforests.
  • 2.4 acres per second ( equivalent to two U.S. football fields) of rainforests are being 
    destroyed per second.

While you were reading these statistics, approximately 149 acres of rainforest were destroyed and 
within the next hour approximately 6 species will become extinct. These magnificent plants and 
animals which took millions of years to evolve and are so rich in their contribution to the entire 
earth ecosystem will die out never to be seen again.

The most important task for the human community at this time is to realize the damage it is 
inflicting and take responsible and united action to curb our wanton
exploitation of the rest of the 
community with which we share our home planet.
We need to realize not only the intrinsic worth 
of every other being but the sobering fact that in destroying them we will ultimately destroy 
ourselves.

 

Over Consumption
                             
Kathleen Loughlin, CSJ
We have not inherited the world from our forebears--we have borrowed it from our children.
Kashmiri Proverb

Since the end of World War II, we in the United States and the first world countries of Europe have
increased our standard of living based on the economic principle of consumerism.  The One Look
 Dictionary
defines this principle as the "utilization of economic goods to satisfy needs." The United
 Nations Human Development Report 1998 emphasizes that since the beginning of the 20th 
century more people are better fed and housed than ever before.  Living standards "have risen to 
enable hundreds of millions to enjoy housing with hot water and cold, warmth and electricity."  
These accommodations --benefits for those members of the human family that possess them--are 
the hallmark of a robust consumption based on individual and societal need

In the Western world, however, consumption has shifted from fulfilling needs to over consumption
--the acquisition of economic goods for their own sake. Need is no longer the norm, but rather the
 purchase of luxuries guides buying power. Reflective of this reality, millionaire Malcolm Forbes 
once quipped: "He who dies with the most toys wins." The far reaching effects of over consumption
 however, are often not visible to the eye or they exist in countries far removed from first world 
countries.  In the United States alone, we account for 5% of the world population and consume
nearly 30% of global oil.  Other statistics that further emphasize the disparity of rich and poor 
nations and the reality of over consumption are the following.  The richest fifth of the world:

  • Consume 45% of all meat and fish, the poorest fifth 5%.

  • Consume 58% of total energy, the poorest fifth less than 4%.

  • Have 74% of all telephone lines, the poorest fifth 1.5%.

  • Consume 84% of all paper, the poorest fifth 1.1%.

  • Own 87% of the world's vehicle fleet, the poorest fifth less than 1%. (Shah)

The citing of these statistics of over consumption vividly convey the rich-poor divide that exists in 
our world today. It also provides a context for examining the effects of over consumption that are 
not readily seen--the influence on our environment. Land degradation, pollution, and global 
warming are three threats to life as we know it on our planet.  Each is a direct result of over 
consumption.  An example: to stock the restaurants in the United States intensive breeding of live 
stock and poultry is necessary. This breeding directly leads to deforestation and contamination of 
water resources.  For every pound of red meat, poultry, eggs, and milk produced, farm fields lose 
about five pounds of irreplaceable top soil (Shiva, pp.70-71).  To understand the magnitude of this
loss is to realize that in the eco-system one change affects all others. For instance, a decrease in 
farmable land may increase the presence of pests and disease which we are not prepared to 
combat. The immensity of this threat is more fully realized when the amount of resources used to
raise beef and other products for restaurants and home is understood.  Shiva writes:

  • Animal farms throughout the world use mostly 40% of the planet's total grain production. 
    The United States uses 70% of its grain fed to livestock.

Not only these types of food that are produced, but other consumer goods pose a series of threats 
for the human family. "The production, processing, and consumption of commodities requires
extraction of natural resources (wood, ore, fossil fuels and water); it requires the creation of factory
complexes whose operations create toxic byproducts, while the use of commodities themselves e.g. automobiles [computers] creates pollutants and waste"  (Robbins).

Concretely, scientists have identified automobile emissions as a contributing pollutant to global 
warming--a reality that is not only translated into warmer winters in some areas, but a greater 
occurrence of hurricanes and droughts.  Also longer spells of dry heat and intense rain are trends 
that are observed throughout the world.  This change in climate, in turn, affects the production of 
food and creates conditions for infectious diseases whose control can not be anticipated. 

Is it feasible that these environmental concerns are influenced by our over consumption?  Are we 
asked to change our lifestyles in a way that is not consistent with our present standard of living?  
These questions must be answered individually.  One response is the growing movement in simple
living where individuals voluntarily make their buying choices out of need rather than luxury.  But 
these questions also need to be answered by the world community. A beginning might be to 
address several issues as we make decisions about consumable goods.  Shah suggests asking:

  • How are the products and resources we consume actually produced? What are the impacts of 
    that process of production on the environment? 
  • What are the impacts of certain forms of consumption on the environment, society, 
    individuals?
  • What is a necessity and what is a luxury?
  •  Business and advertising are major engines in promoting the consumption of products so 
    that they may survive. How much of what we consume is influenced by their needs versus 
    our own needs.

Having reflected on these questions, we may as a world society decide to have:

  • a consumption based on need rather than luxury,
  • a consumption that is shared by all, 
  • a consumption that builds on human capabilities,  
  • a consumption that is socially responsible,
  • a consumption that is kind to our environment. (Shah)

In short, our consumer choices can become a well spring of hope rather than a threat to the 
human family. 

Resources:

Robbins, Richard.  Global Problems and the Culture of Capitalism. Allyn & Beacon, 1999.

Shah, Anup.  Behind Consumption and Consumerism. September 9, 2001,

  www.globalissues.org

Shiva, Vandana.  Stolen Harvest: The Hijacking of the Global Food Supply. South End Press, 1999.

Wachtel, Paul.  The Poverty of Affluence: A Psychological Portrait of the American Way of Life.  
The Free Press, 1983.

Whitaker, Jennifer Seymour.  Salvaging the Land of Plenty: Garbage and the American Dream
William Morrow & Co.,1994.

 

Depletion of Water
                       
Patricia Monahan 

“The life and health of our planet is completely dependent upon water. It carries all present life, the 
seeds of future life, and the memory of past life in its flow. Water is the mediator between life and death between being and nothingness, between health and sickness. Unfortunately, over the years we have lost our connection with this l
ife-giving and life-supporting sacred substance."                    Charlie Ryrie, The Healing Energies of Water  

Sandra Postel, Director of the Global Water Policy Project, is well known as the author of two 
significant books, The Pillar of Sand: Can the Irrigation Miracle Last? and The Last Oasis. In an 
address to the World Watch Institute Forum entitled "International Security and Water Scarcity," she 
stressed that water is a unique resource for three critical reasons.

  • Water is the matrix of culture and the basis of life. Nothing on earth, plant or animal in the
    terrestrial environment, can survive without fresh water. This is the reality one must keep in mind 
    when discussing water.

  • Unlike oil and most other resources of concern, water has no substitutes in most of its uses. 
    Water is needed to grow wheat and corn, to make paper, to cleanse and refresh.

  • Fresh water flows naturally across political boundaries.

These three attributes explain why issues of water rights, water access, water allocation and control 
over water can become both complicated and contentious.
Today the world is moving headlong into a period of fresh water shortage. By 2015, it is estimated that 
nearly three billion people, about 40 percent of the projected population at that time, will be living in
water stressed countries. The citizens of these countries will have difficulty locating enough fresh water 
to meet their daily water requirement for food, as well as for industrial and household uses.
This water shortage will most assuredly increase competition for water between and among countries. 
How nations and economies deal with this increased competition will have far-reaching consequences. Water induced violence is already threatening social and political stability around the world.
   World Watch Fact Sheet on Water Depletion:

  • Since 1950, the global renewable freshwater supply per person has fallen 58 percent as world 
    population has swelled from 2.5 billion to 6 billion.

  • Today Asia has approximately 60 percent of the world’s people but only 36 percent of the world’s
     renewable freshwater.

  • Currently water-stressed countries in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East account for 26 percent 
    of global grain imports. China, India, and Pakistan, all presently grain self-sufficient, will likely join 
    the ranks of grain importers due to decreasing water availability.

  • An analysis of 1,831 international water-related disputes over the last 50 years reveals that two 
    thirds of these encounters were of a competitive nature while one fourth were hostile.

  • Water treaties that provide for effective monitoring and enforcement are critical worldwide.

Resources:

Postel, Sandra. The Last Oasis: Facing Water Scarcity, 1997 – order from World Watch website

Shiva,Vandana. Water Wars: Privatization, Pollution, and Profit. South End Press, Cambridge, 
MA 2002.

State of the World 2003, World Watch Institute

World Watch Institute1776 Massachusetts Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20036

World Watch Website – www.worldwatch.org

For regional or state information, contact:

US Environmental Protection Agency

State EPA Agencies

State Department of Environmental Conservation

State Soil and Water Conservation

Natural Resources Defense Council

Water Education Foundation – www.water-ed.org

Water Pollution

 "Water and life are inseparable.  It has the ability to confer life, uphold life, and transform death into 
new life. Throughout human history water has been connect to mystery, or used as a symbol of mystery. Until we regain an attitude of respect and reverence for water, we are threatening our life and the life of the planet on which we live."   
                     
Charlie Ryrie, The Healing Energies of Water

 Payal Sampat, author of Deep Trouble: The Hidden Threat of Groundwater Pollution, explains 
that "Groundwater contamination is an irreversible act that will deprive future generations of one of life’s
most precious resources. He points out that groundwater is an essential resource for sustaining 
civilization. Approximately 97 percent of Earth’s liquid freshwater is stored in underground aquifers. 
Almost one third of humanity depends completely on groundwater for drinking. This includes some of 
the largest cities in the developing world, such as Jakarta, Dhaka, Lima, and Mexico City. Nearly 99 
percent of the rural U. S. population and 80 percent of India’s villagers, depend on groundwater for 
drinking.
According to Payal, groundwater irrigates some of the world’s most productive cropland. More than 
half of irrigated farmland in India, and 43 percent in the United States, are watered by groundwater. 
Irrigation already accounts for about two thirds of water use worldwide. As rivers and lakes are 
dammed, dried up, or polluted, and as food demand grows in the next 50 years, farmers will become 
increasingly dependent on ground water for irrigation.
World Watch Institute reports that toxic chemicals are contaminating groundwater on every inhabited 
continent. This degradation of water is endangering the world’s most valuable supply of freshwater. 
This first global survey of groundwater pollution shows that a toxic brew of pesticides, nitrogen, 
fertilizers, industrial chemicals, and heavy metals is fouling groundwater everywhere, and that the 
damage is often in the very places where people need water the most.
   "One of the most disturbing aspects of the problem is that groundwater pollution is essentially 
permanent," explains Sampat. Water recycles very slowly underground, too slowly to flush out or dilute
toxic chemicals. Water that enters an aquifer remains there for an average of 1,400 years, compared 
to only 16 days for rivers.
The urgency of preventing groundwater contamination is made obvious when you examine the cost of 
cleanup. Water utilities in western United States spend $400 million each year to treat water for just 
one chemical, the pesticide atrazine. According to the U. S. National Research Council, initial cleanup 
of contaminated groundwater for some 300,000 sites in the United States could cost up to $1 trillion 
over the next 30 years. 
To preserve this invaluable resource, human societies must make major changes in the way they grow 
food, manufacture goods, and dispose of waste. Large corporations and companies must assume the 
greater responsibility for their toxic discharges. Sixty percent of the most hazardous liquid waste in the 
United States, 34 billion liters per year of solvents, heavy metals, and radioactive materials, is injected 
directly into deep groundwater via thousands of "injection wells.

World Watch Fact Sheet on Groundwater Pollution:

  • One third of the wells tested in California’s San Joaquin Valley in 1988 contained pesticide 
    DBCP at levels 10 times higher than the maximum allowed for drinking water, more than a 
    decade after the chemical was banned.

  • The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates that about 100,000 underground storage 
    tanks for gasoline are leaking chemicals into soil and groundwater.

  • India’s Central Pollution Control Board surveyed 22 major industrial zones in the late 1990’s and
    found that groundwater in every one of them was unfit for drinking.

  • In the northern Chinese provinces of Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, and Shandong, nitrate
    concentrations in groundwater exceeded heath guidelines in more than half of the locations 
    studied in 1995.

  • In Manila, where groundwater levels have fallen 50-80 meters because of overdraft, seawater 
    has flowed 5 kilometers inland, contaminating city’s aquifers with salt.

Resources

Sampat, Payal. Deep Trouble" The Hidden Threat of Groundwater Pollution. World Watch Paper 154, 
December 2000.

Shiva,Vandana. Water Wars: Privatization, Pollution, and Profit. South End Press, Cambridge, 
MA, 2002.

State of the World 2003, World Watch Institute

World Watch Institute

World Watch Website – www.worldwatch.org

For regional or state information, contact:

US Environmental Protection Agency

State EPA Agencies

State Department of Environmental Conservation

State Soil and Water Conservation

Natural Resources Defense Council

Water Education Foundation 

  

The Rainforests—Who Knows? 
      
        
   Brigid O’Meara, CSJ

Things are looking really bad for our rainforests, so fabulously rich in plants, animals, and insects
(30 million species!).

 Take a look at how fast they are dying out:

  •        Two football fields per second

  •        149 acres per minute

  •        The area of New York City per day

 Think about that.

 About six species of trees per hour become extinct, primarily because of destruction of their habitat through logging, mining, clearing for cattle ranching, building of dams and roads and uncontrolled development. At root are the materialistic demands of industrialized countries.  If we continue down this road, all tropical rain forest ecosystems will be only a memory by 2030.  
Think about that.

 But all is not lost.  We humans are still capable of protecting our own environs, our own future. It will require repairing damage done and ensuring needed biodiversity to provide for generations yet unborn.

  •      We must stop destruction of the rainforests and vastly  expand  areas to be protected.

  •      We need to improve gene banks, which store seeds, embryos or germplasm.  Although 
    this is a stopgap and imperfect way of preserving species, it is a start.

  • .         Most importantly, we must support national and international organizations’ efforts to advise and inform governments.  Power of government is necessary to tame the onslaught of corporate rape of our rainforests,

 Surely all this seems so big and so beyond the power of the individual, but individuals can do 
something by thinking twice.

  •        We can cut back on the use of paper.  Skip paper plates, towels, etc. and use cloth bags for shopping.  Buy recycled paper products.

  •       We can curb our use of oil by using cars with good gas mileage, trying to do several 
    errands in one trip, and car pooling when possible.  

  •          We can reduce our consumption of beef.  Cattle require huge tracts of grazing land, which cause the further destruction of the rainforests.

  •      We can push for the funding of mass transit.

  •            We can keep our eyes open to hold corporations accountable.

  •           We can write letters to express concern for the rainforests. (www.ran.org)

  •            We can support actions to protect endangered areas( www.ran.org).

  •             We can support the Rainforest Action Network, which coordinates actions among 
    interested individuals (www.ran.org).

God has worked out such a wonderful  home for us on this earth, incredibly complex and 
interdependent.  The harm we humans have done to this splendid plan has endangered not only 
the forests and their inhabitants, but our own well being as well. You can help.

Think about that.

The Gift of Water

In Honor of the International Year of Fresh Water

 

By Patricia A. Monahan

 

What aspect of water delighted you most this summer? Was it sitting beside a stream listening
to the comforting sounds of water gurgling over rock? Was it a friend’s offer of a cold glass of 
water after a stint of gardening? Perhaps it was a swim at the ocean, or a walk along the beach. 
Maybe you recall the soothing relief of soaking tired feet in a pan of warm water. Whatever your
water delight, during this International Year of Fresh Water, we are reminded that water heals, 
refreshes, soothes, cleanses, and blesses.

Though colorless, water enables us to see the colors of the rainbow. While having no form itself, 
it gives form to everything. Billions of years old, water is constantly renewing itself. Water has the 
ability to confer life, uphold life, and to transform death into new life. Every drop of water is a
microcosm of the universe, carrying information from ancient eras and from worlds we have 
yet to imagine. Water is everywhere and in everything. Water is sacred.

In today’s fast-paced society there is a deep desire to reconnect with the sacred in everyday life. 
The ordinary and commonplace can be sacred. This idea has always been central to many belief
systems from the East, and it is no accident that many Eastern societies have a more respectful
attitude toward water than that shown in the West. From similar roots Eastern and Western 
societies developed along markedly different paths over the last two thousand years. While 
the West pursued economic dominance and power for hundreds of years, the second half of 
the 20th century saw a renewed interest by Westerners in Eastern beliefs and practices, and 
a renewed search for spirituality.

Regardless of religious belief, water is a magical, mysterious, and powerful substance that 
bestows life. Every ancient culture revered water. Indeed, all ancient deities were water gods.
The Sumerian’s word mar meant sea, but it was also the word for womb; a was the word for
water, and also meant sperm, conception, and generation. The Hebrew language includes the
ideogram Mem, deciphered as mother, life, womb, or sea. "Everything was water," say Hindu 
texts, and in the Tamtric manuscripts water is prana, the vital breath that brings life. Water and
life were one and the same. Living in dialogue with water connects the physical, emotional, and
mysterious worlds.

Throughout history "holy" water has been understood to heal symbolically, and in some instances,
physically. Baptism is probably the universal symbol of purification and regeneration. It was first
introduced in the rites of Egypt. It is also rooted in Shinto, Confucian, and Hindu customs of 
bathing in sacred waters to symbolically cleanse all sin. The baptism of Jesus by John prepared 
him to accept his mission on Earth as the Son of God. In Western culture, baptism may be the 
only ritual associated with water that is recognized as having a spiritual element. While there are
many who practice their faith, others who may never step inside a church for religious reasons 
still want their children to be baptized even though it may seem unconnected to other aspects of
their life. There remains a need to recognize our spiritual nature, a desperate desire to find
meaning on a deeper level within the context of the Earth community.

Modern industrialized people, detached from the land and the seasons, often forget the connection.
When it rains, we complain of the inconvenience, or how it interferes with our plans. Yet, lack of rain
causes the greatest complaints when authorities impose limitations on water usage and people
can no longer water lawns and gardens. God forbid that water be turned off for even a few hours 
during major plumbing and construction jobs. The link between water and fertility is only recognized 
when it impinges on private demands.

The irony is that because water has been taken for granted for so long, water shortages even in
the Western world are threatening human health and the health of the environment. Humans have
forgotten their dependence upon water. Until we regain an attitude of respect and reverence,
the entire planet is at risk.

If we reflect upon our dependence on water, we will begin to use it more carefully. Unfortunately
it retains only the faintest vestige of the sacred for most of us. Our exploitation of water has been 
continuing for centuries, but has become more obvious in the last 65 years. Now much of the 
world has piped water, and piped sewage systems, too. We no longer think about how we get 
clean water, how we dispose of it once we have dirtied it, or how much of it we use. If we take the
time to appreciate the marvelous substance water is in itself, we will readily realize that water is
the source of life, and if we appreciate its qualities we can become empowered by it.

That doesn’t mean we have to completely change our lifestyles, but we have to become more 
conscious of the world around us and reconnect with the more spiritual side of life in nature. Take
 time to reflect on or meditate by water… a stream, a lake, a river, an ocean. Realize that water is
alive. It has reflected and carried the beliefs of every society since time began. It works in 
mysterious ways, but, without it, all life stops. Once we begin to understand the true nature of 
water, we will realize that it is the key to our spiritual, emotional, and physical well-being. As we
reconnect with this sacred element, we may be closer to reconnecting to the true Source of
Divine Life.

References: Ryrie, Charlie. The Healing Energies of Water. Charles E. Tuttle Co. Inc. 
North Clarendon, VT. 1999.

Pharr, Virginia. Growing in Care of the Earth. Saint Mary’s Press. Winona, MI 1998.

 

Soil Erosion 

 Mary Lou Buser, CSJ   

Soil erosion is a natural phenomenon which has been happening for over 400 million years, or since the first plant grew in soil.  The primary causes of soil erosion are water and wind.  Nature, left to itself, erodes soil at about the same rate as it produces soil.  (Soil is produced by a process known as weathering, the wearing down of rocks by various means)  Humankind, however, with the onset of agriculture, cattle grazing, lumbering and other means of deforestation, along with development of natural lands for homes and industry is quickening the pace of soil erosion to a degree that is becoming of great concern to scientists, conservationists and any who are concerned about the future of this earth.   

Water and wind are the major causes of soil erosion.  The splash of the water drop on the soil detaches  particles that are light and loose.  These particles can be native to the soil as well as man made additions such as fertilizers and pesticides.  The detached particles are then transported by gravity or the rush of rapidly moving water to lakes, streams and rivers where the particle build up is called sediment and the process called sedimentation. We all learned about the Mississippi Delta which is a classic example of this process.  

Wind can also detach particles from soil though it is not as forceful in accomplishing the process as is water.   

The effects of the erosion process at the site of the detachment (on site erosion) are significant; the most significant being the loss of top soil which contains the nutrients necessary for plant growth.  Top soil is being lost in the   U.S.  at an alarming rate and the long term effects of this are very serious.  However, in the short term farmers have at their disposal synthetic fertilizers which can be applied to the depleting soil for a “quick fix” and the long term effects of excessive soil erosion go ignored.  In poor, developing countries this “quick fix” is not readily available and their crops are not healthy or they are forced to buy fertilizers from the developed countries that produce them.  The farmers in poor, developing countries are very much aware of the on site effects of excessive soil erosion.   

The effects of the soil erosion process as the particles are transported (off site erosion) are also significant. Particles that are detached from the land in one particular area can create a nutrient rich environment in other areas as the sediment is transported as well as when it comes to rest in a lake bed or mouth of a river. This is a positive effect.  However, since most of our macrofarms require vast amounts of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, these too are transported throughout our waterways causing pollution and unhealthy sediment.     

Many studies are underway regarding the effects of climate change on soil erosion.  It appears that most  scientists agree that global changes in climate are hastening the rate of soil erosion on earth today.   

RESOURCES:   

www.topsoil.nserl.purdue.edu/nserlweb 

www.soilerosion.net 

www.seafriends.org.nz/enviro/soil/erosion.htm 

www.nmw.ac.uk/gctefocus3/networks/erosion.htm 

  

                                               Pollution and Climate Change 

                                                               Joan Gallagher, CSJ   

Climate can be defined as the “expected weather” of a region or zone on Earth.  Earth’s climate has 
changed during its 4.2 billion years of existence.  During the evolving years of Earth as we know it, the major
causes of climate change were due to: 

Ø      Changes in Earth’s orbit around the sun 

Ø      Changes in the amount of energy coming from the sun 

Ø      Changes in ocean circulation 

Ø      Changes in the composition of Earth's atmosphere 

Energy from the sun drives Earth’s weather and climate and heats Earth’s surface.  In turn Earth radiates
energy back into space.  Atmospheric greenhouse gases, such as water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, 
nitrous oxide, trap some of the outgoing energy. 

   For the past 10,000 years these greenhouse gases have maintained an average and hospitable 
temperature of 59
°on our planet.  However with the industrial revolution there has been a larger emission of 
greenhouse gases.  The increased concentration of these gases has enhanced the heat trapping 
capabilities of Earth’s atmosphere.  

 Over the past century it has been observed that the major causes of climate change have shifted as a 
result of human activities.  These activities have raised the levels of greenhouse gases as follows: 

Ø      Burning of fossil fuels have increased carbon dioxide by 30% 

Ø      Energy and transportation have increased nitrous oxide by 15% 

Ø      Land use and food have more than doubled concentrations of methane 

The overall affect of the unnatural accumulation of these gases has increased the global surface temperatures
 1.0
º.  The 20th Century’s 10 warmest years have occurred in the last 15 years of the century.  The 
increased temperature has caused sea levels to rise 4”-8” this past century.   Worldwide precipitation
 over land has increased 1%.  In the   United States  the frequency of extreme rainfall has increased.  
Remember the spring of 2003? 

These changes validate the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports of what we 
can expect if emissions of greenhouse gases do not change: 

Ø      Greater weather extremes, i.e., stronger storms, longer and drier droughts, heavier rains and
increased numbers of floods 

Ø      Altered patterns of climate and weather-less rainfall in the interior continents 

Ø      Increase in sea levels 

Earth’s atmosphere does not distinguish where emissions come from.  A greenhouse warmed world
 sets off the natural climate changes of the planet to more drastic climate changes for the planet.  
The impact on the global community: 

Ø      Displacement of persons due to rising sea levels 

Ø      Unpredictable fresh water supply 

Ø      Reintroduction of diseases such as malaria 

Ø      Loss of ecosystems and biodiversity 

Ø      Diminishment of ocean phytoplankton which supply 70% of the oxygen we breathe and which 
are a major consumer of carbon dioxide 

Ø      Food insecurity with diminished agricultural production which in turn can set off the world’s 
economy (It should be noted that genetically engineered food do not have the natural coping 
mechanisms to deal with changes in temperature, sun and moisture) 

  In December 1997, the world’s national governments met in   Kyoto , Japan  , to negotiate a treaty 
to start dealing seriously with climate change.  The framework of the treaty reduces emissions of greenhouse gases and sets emissions caps.  The Kyoto Protocol will only become international law when it is ratified by at least 55 countries
To date 22 countries have signed on, the   United States of America  not being one of them. 

 What can one do locally to assist global efforts to halt unnatural changes in climate: 

Ø      Write government officials encouraging the   United States  to sign onto the Kyoto Protocol 

Ø      Shift mindset from dominance and power to one of reverence and respect 

Ø      Acknowledge worth of creation 

      Recognize the other and one’s responsibility towards the other 

Ø      Seek to employ alternative forms of renewable energies, i.e., Solar, Geo-thermal, wind, etc.   

        “In retrospect it will be clear.  A hundred years from now, people may well 
         remember the 1990’s not as the decade of the Internet’s spread or the Dow’s 
        ascension but as the years when global temperatures began spiking upward-
        as the years when rain and wind and ice and sea water began irrefutably to
        reflect the power and heedlessness of our species.  But how bad it will get 
        depends on how deeply and how quickly we can feel.” 

                                                                        Bill McKibben, author of “The End of Nature” 

  Resources: 

 Hawken, Paul, Lovins,  Amory,  Lovins, L. Hunter.  Natural Capitalism:  Creating the Next Industrial 
Revolution.
 Little, Brown & Company,   New York  . 1999 

 Wackernagel, Mathis & Rees, William.  Our Ecological Footprint:  Reducing Human Impact on the
Earth
.  New Society Publishers,   Gabriola Island ,  BC  . 1996. 

 Nattrass, Brian & Altomare, Mary.  The Natural Step for Business:  Wealth, Ecology & the Evolutionary 
Corportation
. New Society Publishers,   Gabriola Island ,  BC  . 1999. 

   http://www.unep.org 

    http://www.nrpe.org 

  

An Update: Bottled Water

We can’t help but notice that our supermarket shelves are lined with various brands of bottled water and it’s almost
stylish to carry a bottle of water and sip from it regularly.  This is so because we’ve learned that it’s good for us to
drink plenty of water and bottled water is safer and healthier to drink than water which comes directly from the faucet.  According to an article in a recent issue of “YES!” magazine, bottled water may not be better for us than tap water, after all.

The article tells of a study done by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).  While it is a complex and complicated issue one basic outcome of the study is that about one third of the 103 brands of bottled water tested
had microbial content in excess of state regulations. Although some tap water may also be contaminated the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) guidelines call for near constant inspection of tap water but it does not oversee
the bottled water industry.  The industry tests its own water and some pathogens are allowed if a disclaimer is put
on the label. The Food and Drug Administration monitors only the bottled water that crosses state lines.  Each state is responsible for monitoring the water which is produced and sold within that state and only seven states have effective regulations. For these reasons it is important to seek further information in an effort to make informed decisions about the water we drink.

 

We can’t help but notice that our supermarket shelves are lined with various brands of bottled water and it’s almost stylish to carry a bottle of water and sip from it regularly.  This is so because we’ve learned that it’s good for us to drink plenty of water and bottled water is safer and healthier to drink than water which comes directly from the faucet.  According to an article in a recent issue of “YES!” magazine, bottled water may not be better for us than tap water, after all.

The article tells of a study done by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).  While it is a complex and complicated issue one basic outcome of the study is that about one third of the 103 brands of bottled water tested had microbial content in excess of state regulations. Although some tap water may also be contaminated the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) guidelines call for near constant inspection of tap water but it does not oversee the bottled water industry.  The industry tests its own water and some pathogens are allowed if a disclaimer is put on the label. The Food and Drug Administration monitors only the bottled water that crosses state lines.  Each state is responsible for monitoring the water which is produced and sold within that state and only seven states have effective regulations. For these reasons it is important to seek further information in an effort to make informed decisions about the water we drink

 

Resource:

“Bottled Water Flimflam” by Krista Camenzind from YES! A Journal of Positive Futures   Winter 2004  

Mercury

The Bush Administration has made a proposal that will allow the country's dirtiest power plants to continue to release hazardous levels of mercury into the environment. Mercury is known to cause mental retardation, learning disabilities and attention disorders in newborns and growing children. This plan signals a complete change from the Clinton-era decision to make industry reduce its mercury emissions by 90 percent by the year 2007. Mercury spewing from power plant smokestacks falls into lakes, streams and ponds accumulating in fish and endangering humans and animals that eat fish.  The administration's retreat on mercury is more shocking given the fact that it came only days after the Food and Drug Administration warned pregnant women and nursing mothers against eating more than two servings of a variety of fish and not more than one can of  tuna per week because of the high levels of mercury in fish. 
                                                                                                   (Adapted from Nature's Voice)

        

Exxon Mobil's Climate Footprint

" For the first time, the historic contribution of one company to global climate change has been calculated.  The assessment findings of ExxonMobil's historical emissions has significant implications for the company's
legal exposure and for its stockholders.  
Friends of the Earth commissioned two studies that showed ExxonMobil, including its predecessors, caused 4.7 to 5.3 percent of the world's manmade carbon dioxide emissions between 1882 and 2002.  Carbon dioxide
emissions are the principal cause of global warming.  Despite U.N .scientists findings in 1996 that man-made pollution is having a discernible influence on the global climate, seven out of the ten worst years of ExxonMobil's emissions occurred after 1996. ExxonMobil has repeatedly attempted to undermine the scientific consensus on climate change and actively resisted attempts to limit carbon dioxide emissions through law."
                                                                                             
Excerpt from Friends of the Earth, Spring 2004
Air Pollution

" By the end of the 20th century, medical research had confirmed that air pollution from cars and utility plants makes people sick.  Coal burning utility plants emit nitrogen oxide which affects the ozone layer and accounts for the clouds of smog hanging over our cities.  Acid rain is formed when nitrogen oxide combines with sulfur dioxide, water and oxygen.  Burning coal yields mercury as a vapor which accumulates in swordfish and tuna and results in brain disorders in fetuses and affects young
children.  Every year 30,000 Americans die from pollution related ailments."
                                                               "Changing All the Rules," The New York Times Magazine, (Bruce Barcott) 4 April2004,p.42.

The Wilderness Society is trying to stop big oil, timber and other wealthy special interests from using their government connections to move an anti-environment agenda that hands over our wild places to special interests and sacrifices the beautiful places of our American heritage. These are some of the areas that are threatened: 

Alaska                       Denali – threatened by road building  off-road vehicles.
                                    Arctic National Wildlife Refuge – Threatened by oil drilling.

California                 California’s Coastlands – threatened by oil drilling
                                    Death Valley – threatened by road building and mining.

Florida                       Florida – threatened by mining, 15,000 acres will be destroyed.

New York                  New York’s Northern Forest – threatened by development and home building, over 100,000 acres 
are up for sale to the highest bidder.

Texas                         Padre Island National Seashore – threatened by gas drilling.
This is the crucial nesting ground of the world’s most endangered sea turtle.

Utah                           Grand Staircase Escalante – threatened by road building and off-road vehicles.
 
Arches – threatened by oil and gas drilling. 52,000 pound thumper trucks
are okayed to explore this delicate region.

Wyoming                  Yellowstone – threatened by snowmobiles.
Grand Teton – threatened by snowmobiles.

 

Signs of a Changing Planet

Carbon Dioxide is a key contributor to global warming in the atmosphere.  Although the United States still emits more Carbon Dioxide than any other nation, China and India may be contributing to an increasing rise in temperature by burning more fossil fuels.

According to recent calculations by Professor Curt Davis at the University of Missouri-Columbia, the higher elevation portions of ice sheets in Greenland  are thinning at the rate of four inches each year.  The coastal glaciers are diminishing more rapidly losing three to six feet of ice a year.

The Atlantic  Ocean's tropical and subtropical regions are getting saltier. The journal NATURE published a study indicating that higher than average temperatures are evaporating more ocean water from the hottest parts of the world.  This water eventually condenses at the poles where the oceans are becoming less salty.  The imbalance disrupts the flow of water north and south in the Gulf Stream. If this continues at its current rate , winters in northern Europe could cool by 9 to 18 
degrees Fahrenheit within half a century.

 

BUSH IGNORES HIS OWN PROMISES ON WETLANDS

Last week, President Bush said he is working to "restore, improve and protect at least 3 million wetland acres over the next five years."[1] But according to a new report released today, the Bush administration has actually done the reverse by using a key court ruling to encourage a severe degradation of wetlands throughout the country.

As the Washington Post reports, the Bush administration "has allowed developers to drain thousands of acres of wetlands under a policy adopted last year." The study, which documents the administration policy, was conducted by four nonpartisan environmental watchdog groups and based on documents acquired through the Freedom of Information Act. It found that the Bush administration's interpretation of a 2001 Supreme Court decision has ensured that developers are 
allowed to run roughshod over previous efforts to protect fragile wetlands.[2]

You can read the full report online at www.nrdc.org.

Sources:
1. "Supporting America's Farmers and Conserving America's Land," The White House, 08/04/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1255003&l=50132.
2. "Report Says U.S. Is Draining Wetlands," The Washington Post, 08/12/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=1255003&l=50133.
Accelerated Global Warming

Jacqueline McGlade, executive director of The European Environmental Agency, urged action to halt accelerating global warming or face deadly heat waves and floods such as those that killed thousands and burned up crops last summer. The agency warned that much more needs to be done and fast.  It said rising temperatures could eliminate three-quarters of the Alpine glaciers by 2050.  Global warming has been evident for years but the problem is becoming acute.  It is believed to be
intensified by human activities especially emissions of heat- trapping greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels.  The European Union has been a leader in pushing for the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol, a UN pact drawn up in 1997 to reduce carbon dioxide emission worldwide by  2010 to 8% below 1990 levels.  All 25 EU members are among the 123 countries that have ratified the pact. It isn't in effect because it hasn't reached the required number of nations to ratify it.  The United States ,which is the world's biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, has refused to ratify the pact arguing that the agreement would hurt its economy.  Russia has not signed either.The three hottest years on record - 1998, 2002, and 2003- occurred within the past six years with the average global 
temperature now rising at almost 0.36 degrees per decade.
                                                                                                         Newsday, August 19, 2004

 


Carbon Dioxide Levels Rise Abruptly

“Levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere have jumped abruptly, raising fears that global warming may be accelerating out of control. Concentrations of this gas rose by a record amount in the past 12 months. It is the third successive year in which these concentrations have increased sharply--an unprecedented triennial surge.  Even the Pentagon has issued a warning that the planet could experience abrupt climate change in the not too distant future and that the consequences–large masses of people being displaced or starved–pose the greatest security threat to the United States.
Other evidence suggests time is running out:

  • In 1910 there were 150 glaciers in Glacier National Park; now there are fewer than 30.
  • Lobsters have sickened and died due to increased water temperatures.
  • This Spring, hundreds of thousands of Scottish seabirds failed to breed.

Yet the United States and the World Bank undermine efforts to curb global warming. For example:

  • The US allows the auto industry to drag its feet in the development of fuel efficient automobiles.
  • The burning of jet fuel and exhaust from planes play a significant role in climate change.

We need to elect competent leaders who will be part of the solution in resolving these issues.”

                          Moisha Blechman, Sierra Club


 

Signs of A Changing Planet

"An odd thing happened in the Scottish isles this summer: seabirds produced scarcely any young.  Most of the avian species in this bird-watchers paradise-- including guillemots, Arctic Terns, and Shetland kittiwakes---depend on sand eels --  small ,silvery fish that feed on plankton.  Scientists believe that the plankton are moving north as ocean temperatures rise, breaking the food chain and leaving the rugged islands' birds too hungry to breed."

                                                                                                          Sierra Magazine

The Oil Industry Eyes the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Again

"The Bush Administration, Congress, and the oil industry are at it again, pushing to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska to oil drilling, a move the Senate rejected last year. Known as "America's Serengeti," the Arctic Refuge is home to polar bears, caribou, migratory birds and other wildlife. Despite widespread public opposition to drilling in sensitive wildlife habitat, the battle could start again in early 2005. Speak out - tell President Bush and Congress that Americans oppose trading wilderness and wildlife for more global warming pollution and a mere six-month supply of oil."  Take action!

America's Waters: Vulnerable to Development Pollution

Bush administration policy dubbed "Reckless Abandon".

"
Nearly two years after the Bush administration issued a policy directive instructing federal agencies not to protect the  bulk of America's waters, a new report from Earthjustice and three other environmental groups shows that clean water protections are being withdrawn from streams, wetlands, lakes, and rivers across the country.Reckless Abandon: How the Bush Administration is Exposing America's Waters to Harm is based on federal documents obtained by the four groups from the US Army Corps of Engineers.  Through 15 case studies, the report demonstrates how the administration's January 2003 directive has prompted federal regulators to stop using the Clean Water act to protect waters including an 86-acre Lake in Wisconsin, a 150-mile long river in New Mexico, a 4000-acre tract of wetlands in Florida, and a 70-mile long canal in California that even serves as a drinking water supply.
The directive made clear that no prior permission is required for EPA or Corps field staff to ignore Clean Water Act protections and allow industrial facilities, developers and others to pollute, fill, or destroy these waters. In addition,the policy excludes from protection several types of waters found across the country that provide critical habitats for an array of migratory birds, amphibians, and other wildlife.

The report is available online at: http://www.earthjustice.org/

 

" The Endangered Species Act States that when an agency plans to do something that might have a deleterious effect  On a protected species it must consult the agencies that employ wildlife specialists, namely the Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service. The issue recently surfaced when Earth Justice sued the EPA for failing to protect salmon bearing streams from a wide
range of toxic pesticides. That suit resulted in a court order requiring the imposition of a buffer zone and the placing of warnings in places where the pesticides are sold. Soon after the court issued its order, the EPA issued regulations announcing that it will no longer consult NMFS or FWS but will instead ask itself whether the various pesticides will harm salmon and other protected species.  this has
profound implications for scarce wildlife in every corner of the land and appears to be in violation of the law.

For more information on this administration's environmental record:  
www.earthjustice.org

www.foe.org

Long Island Water and Organic Gardening

                                               Mary Lou Buser, CSJ

We are all aware of the importance of water.  We know we can’t live without it. We are
also aware that potable (drinkable) water is becoming scarce; in some parts of our world
it is almost non-existent.  We here on LI have always had plenty of water which
we pump from underground aquifers.  These aquifers have been in place since the
glaciers receded about 10,000 years ago and are replenished by precipitation
 – a wonderful water cycling process.  With the increase in population, farming and industry
over the last hundred years or so  water is taken from the aquifers at a faster
pace than it can be replenished. This is causing the salt water of the Atlantic Ocean 
and Long Island Sound to encroach upon and shrink the fresh water supply within
the aquifers. There is additional concern about toxic chemicals which are leaching
into and contaminating our water supply.

We know we must conserve water.  Though conservation by individuals is important,
conservation by farmers is even more important. It is estimated that 60 – 70% of
potable water is used to irrigate farmland in the United States. Organic farmers and
gardeners are on the forefront of conserving water.  Since soil rich in organic matter 
tends to hold moisture, organic farming and gardening requires less watering.
Also, these farmers and gardeners try to use water more efficiently by directing
the water to where it is needed -- at a plants roots.

The organic garden in Brentwood uses a drip watering system. Thanks to our volunteer,
Ernie Herrington, we have a very effective drip system which  Ernie hopes to make 
even more effective next year.

This is but one way we can help to conserve water on Long Island .

Organic Garden

Many people are becoming more aware of the nutritional advantages of eating food shortly after it’s harvested.  They are also aware that the energy derived by eating lettuce or spinach shipped from California is dwarfed by the energy spent in processing, packaging and shipping that lettuce cross country. 
We work a natural garden on our Brentwood grounds because we are aware that all of God’s creation is sacred and should be treated with respect and care.  One way we can do this is to counter the industrial agricultural industry which grows monocultures of soy, corn and wheat etc. These industrial farmers use chemical (petroleum based) fertilizers and chemical pesticides.  Both of these ultimately deplete the soil of its natural life.  Lifeless soil tends to erode very easily and of course requires ever more chemicals.
Our choice is to engage in diversified gardening as a model of sound, natural gardening.  We plant a variety of crops, rotate them regularly, and use the spent plants, weeds, grass and leaves (all rich in nutrients) to fertilize the soil. Nothing is wasted.  Our natural garden is a good example of sustainability.  As a bonus, diversified gardening attracts very few harmful insects and those that do come are quickly repelled by the beneficial insects that are attracted to our flowers. 
Gardening in this manner keeps ever before our eyes the wonders of God’s creation: the good relationships and cooperation between the plants and animal life; the diverse dying and rising within a vegetable garden, and the beauty of the plants, flowers and tress. 
We welcome you to visit our garden.  In season, come and taste strawberries picked that very day, peas that can be eaten right from the bush and tomatoes picked at the peak of ripeness.  We also grow squash, potatoes, eggplant, lettuce and herbs which you probably would not want to eat at the garden, but are available for you to take home for cooking. 
If you wish you may come to the garden to just sit and relax.  You’ll be entertained by the bees which journey from our bee hives (which are at a safe distance) to partake of the nectar provided by the flowers in the garden.  In return the bees do a good bit of pollinating as do the butterflies and various birds that come to visit.  We